University of Georgia

Fall Semester 2008

Sociology 3220: Development of Sociological Theory

Section A: Tuesday & Thursday 8:00-9:15

Section B: Tuesday & Thursday 11:00-12:15

Baldwin 322

 

Dr. David Smilde, Baldwin 115

Tel. 583.8071; e-mail dsmilde@uga.edu

Office hours: 12:15-2pm, Tuesday, or by appt.

 

Sara Morris, Baldwin 401

Tel. 542.1275 e-mail: szmorris@uga.edu

Office hours: 12:30-2, Tuesday, or by appt.

 

 

It’s interesting, if you think about it, that there exists a domain of knowledge referred to as “sociological theory”—most academic sociology programs have required classes devoted to it, the American Sociological Association even has a section devoted to it. Isn’t all sociological writing guided by theory either implicitly or explicitly? Doesn’t all social theory make ample use of empirical examples? So what is the difference? Indeed, there is little difference. Many of the classic works in social theory we are going to study were considered empirical treatments in their day. Certain works are selected out as works of “sociological theory” because they have become foundational treatments defining the most basic sociological questions and perspectives still used today. The hope is that this will give you knowledge of the derivation and history of the concepts, discourses, and dilemmas still current in social scientific debate. Such knowledge will facilitate your ability to analyze social problems and assimilate sociological research.

            A classic is a classic because it continues to engage the attention of readers through different periods and contexts. The classic text is, in other words, “multivalent,” having various possible meanings depending on how it engages with the reader. As such there is no objective “development of sociological theory,” there are only different perspectives on this development. These different perspectives may be contradictory, but more often they are complimentary or simply distinct. This semester we will be looking at this history under the guise of “four traditions,” as described by Randall Collins. We will also read excerpts from original texts, collected by Collins. I feel it necessary to include original texts in this class because only in this way will you be able to fully take advantage of their multivalence. Furthermore, as future professionals in an increasingly globalized and diverse world, the ability to interpret forms of communication that arise from social, cultural and temporal contexts other than your own is essential. Learning how to figure out where an author is coming from by looking at his (unfortunately we will cover no female authors) context and how to see through odd forms of expression are key abilities you should hone in this class.

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluation

 

Double-entry journals

Twenty percent of your grade will derive from the double-entry journals you will be keeping on the twenty reading assignments. For each reading you will need to copy down a passage of four sentences or more, and write 200 words or more reflecting on that passage. You will write and submit these by e-mail starting Thursday, August 28. Simply compose an e-mail message to the following address: soci3220@gmail.com write your journal entry and send it off before class starts. If your e-mail has been sent correctly, you will immediately receive an acknowledgement of receipt. Note that gmail will only send this message once every four days. So if you submit a journal entry on Tuesday and get an acknowledgement, you will not get one on Thursday.

This is “low stakes” writing. This means that if you simply do the assignment and have obviously made an effort you will get a four. If you simply do not do it you will get a 0. Grades such as 1, 2, and 3 will represent intermediates between these two poles. You will write these and send them as e-mail. Sara Morris will randomly pick seven days this semester to grade these journals. When she does she will return your message to you with the grade. At the end of the semester we will take the top five grades. Or, put differently, we will drop the lowest two grades.

All readings and journal entries must be completed before the class date they are listed on the syllabus. In this way you will be prepared to participate in class discussion. Journal entries that are chosen for grading will be graded on the same day they are due. If the time on your e-mail message is later than the start time of your class (8am for Section A, 11am for Section B) on the day they are due, you will receive a zero for it.

 

 

Five-page papers

You will produce two five-page papers during the semester each worth forty percent of your grade. We have four thematic divisions in this class. You will have to produce a five page paper on the first two (utilitarian tradition and conflict tradition) as well as on the second two (durkheimian tradition and microinteractionist tradition). For each paper you will use the two traditions to understand any current social or political issue (for example, the utilitarian tradition vs. the conflict tradition on violence). This class will focus on not only on writing but on the art of giving and receiving feedback on writing. For each paper, we will dedicate three classes to this.

 

  1. We will have a “paper topic discussion session” in which we will get around in a circle and discuss your ideas for paper topics. Students will describe the topic they are considering writing about and the two faculty members will provide suggestions and orientation.
  2. In the next session you will hand bring to class three hard copies of your papers and Dr. Smilde will grade three or so of them in class on screen. The idea is for you to see what goes in to grading.
  3. For the following class, each student will comment on the papers of two other students and we will discuss them in groups of five

 

Please note that the first draft will be worth ten percent of your final grade. It is not optional. If you do not hand it in on time, you will get a zero for that ten percent. Sara Morris will get it back to you in one week, and you will submit your final draft (worth ten percent as well) one week later to soci3220@gmail.com  The same pattern will be followed for the final papers (see session calendar below).

 

Active participation in class, in turn, will put you in good shape to write the papers efficiently and intelligently. If you attend and participate in the feedback sessions and write a serious first draft, you should have no problem getting a good grade on these papers and getting a scholarship-renewing or athletic-eligibility-maintaining grade in this class.

 

Double-entry journals                                         20%

            -20 journal entries

            -7 randomly graded, 4pt scale

            -5 keepers x 4pts = 20

 

Midterm paper                                                  40%

            -first draft = 10 pts

            -peer grading 5 x 2 = 10pts

            -final draft = 20 pts

 

Final paper                                                       40%

            -first draft = 10 pts

            -peer grading 5 x 2 = 10pts

            -final draft = 20 pts

 

Policies

 

Laptops

You are not allowed to use your laptop during class. I fully realize that many students now take their notes in class on their laptop. However, beyond the temptation of checking your e-mail, chatting or researching spring break hotel packages during class, the use of laptops breaks the flow of the university class room. Too often I have had excellent students that do not participate because they have their noses in their laptops trying to transcribe every word of our discussion. The goal of an upper-level class like this is not to take copious notes but rather to think, discuss and use the ideas we are working with. If you keep a register of your classes in word processing files, you can take this opportunity to develop your skills in jotting down notes and keywords that can be elaborated later at your computer. In any case, this class has no midterm or final exam in which you will have to reproduce facts and details from class. Rather, you should spend your time working with the ideas in class to get a feel for them to the point that you can work with them in your papers.

 

 

Class participation

The immense logistic difficulty and expense of getting thirty-odd adults in the same place at the same time can only be justified by us interacting over the topic of this class. Thus this class will be a mixture of lecture and discussion. Participating actively in class will be the best way for you to get a handle on the concepts and to stimulate participation; I will provide the following incentive structure.

 

Enthusiastic participation                                    + 2pts

Strong participation                                            + 1pts

Average participation                                         no points

Irregular or substandard participation                  - 1pt

Negative or uncooperative participation              - 2pts

 

“Enthusiastic participation” means you actively contribute to the collective realization of this thing called SOCI 3220. Negative or uncooperative participation means you arrive late, leave early, say inappropriate things, treat others disrespectfully, or are lost when I call on you.

 

I will frequently use my name cards to call on people when I ask a question. I will keep track of whether it seems you are thinking about the issues, are lost, not present, etc. The idea of class participation is for us to learn to work with ideas verbally. This is a university which means discussion is open. All political perspectives and cultural beliefs are legitimate objects of discussion, even if they are yours. One object of this class is to make clear that beyond the world of cable TV news, the issues confronting contemporary society cannot be broken down into conservative vs. liberal, red state vs. blue state. In this class there are no “politically correct” positions, and you do not even have to believe the position you are promoting or defending. In fact I recommend you try on an unpopular idea and take it for a spin. Both policies of calling on people and open discussion can sometimes cause uncomfortable moments. But that is what universities are about: freely working with ideas so that you’re ready when you’re in the “real world.”

 

Listserv

This class has a listserv: SOCI3220-L@listserv.uga.edu that Sara and I will frequently use for announcements. You can also use it for any pressing concerns, problems, issues or discussion. In fact useful discussion on the listserv is something I will consider when assigning participation points.

 

Attendance

Class will begin promptly at 11 am and end at 12:15. Please do not arrive late. Attendance will be taken by sign-up sheet at some point during the class (usually the beginning). Good attendance will be encouraged through the following incentive structure.

 

0-1    classes missed = 2 points added to final grade

2-3   classes missed = 1 points added to final grade

5-6 classes missed = 1 point subtracted

7-8 classes missed = 2 points subtracted

> 8 classes missed = automatic withdrawal

 

There are no excused absences—if you miss a class on a day when attendance is taken, you will lose the bonus point regardless of your reason. That is why I give four freebies. Please do not bring me a medical or other excuse unless it accounts for more than four absences. It is your responsibility to see to it that you have signed the sign-up sheet. Anyone signing for someone else is guilty of academic dishonesty, and will be dealt with through the Office of the Vice President for Instruction.

 

The final grading scale will be the following.

 

A          94-100

A-         90-93

B+        87-89

B          84-86

B-         80-83

C+        77-79

C          74-76

C-         70-73

D          60-69

F          0-59

 

Please note that since bonus points are so easy to earn, I will not round up fractional points; that means, for example, that if a student has a final point score of 86.99, the student will receive a final grade of a B.

 

Required Texts

In the bookstore you will find two texts you must purchase:

 

Randall Collins. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Randall Collins (ed.). 1994. Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings. New York: Oxford University Press.

 

 

About the Instructors:

 

David Smilde is Associate Professor of Sociology at UGA. He received his Ph.D in sociology from the University of Chicago in December 2000. Besides UGA, he has taught at the Universidad Católica Andres Bello, the Universidad Central de Venezuela, University of Chicago, and Notre Dame University. During academic year 2006-07 he served as a Fulbright Scholar to Venezuela, researching religion and political conflict during the presidency of Hugo Chavez. Dr. Smilde recently published Reason to Believe: Cultural Agency in Latin American Evangelicalism. University of California Press, 2007.

 

Sara Morris is a graduate student in UGA’s Sociology Department. Her MA thesis focused on the behavioral effects of corporal punishment.  Her research interests focus on behavior problems in children, specifically juvenile delinquency and how it is affected by family relationships.

 
 

 


Class Schedule

 

I. Introduction

 

Tuesday 8/19.

First day shop keeping: roll, syllabus, expectations. The Rise of the Social Sciences” Four Sociological Traditions pp.3-46.

 

II. The Rational / Utilitarian Tradition

 

Thursday 8/21

“The Rational / Utilitarian Tradition” Four Sociological Traditions pp.121-153

 

Tuesday 8/26

George Homans “Social Exchange among Equals and Unequals” pp.135-144; and Mancur Olson “Public Goods and the Free Rider Problem” pp.162-170  FST: Selected Readings

 

Thursday 8/28

“The Rational / Utilitarian Tradition” Four Sociological Traditions pp.153-180.

 

Tuesday 9/2

James March and Herbert Simon “Bounded Rationality and Satisficing” and Thomas Schelling “Tacit Coordination” FST: Selected Readings pp.145-161.

 

Thursday 9/4

James Coleman “The Realization of Effective Norms” FST: Selected Readings pp.171-189.

 

 

III. Conflict Tradition

 

Tuesday 9/9

“The Conflict Tradition” Four Sociological Traditions pp.47-81.

 

Thursday 9/11

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels “History as Class Struggle,” and “Materialism and the Theory of Ideology,” FST: Selected Readings pp.4-17.

 

Tuesday 9/16

Writing Instruction I: How to Research your Topic

 

Thursday 9/18

Karl Marx “The Class Basis of Politics and Revolution” FST: Selected Readings pp.17-35.

 

Tuesday 9/23

“The Conflict Tradition” Four Sociological Traditions pp.81-118.

 

Thursday 9/25

Max Weber “Asceticism and the Spirit of Capitalism” The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism [packet].

*Protestant ethic handout

 

-------------------

IV. Midterm Papers

 

Tuesday 9/30

Group discussion of paper topics

 

Thursday 10/2

Draft grading session

[3 hard copies of first draft must be brought to class]

 

Tuesday 10/7

Draft discussion session.

 

 

V. Durkheimian Tradition

 

Thursday 10/9

“The Durkheimian Tradition” Four Sociological Traditions pp.181-224

 

Tuesday 10/14

Emile Durkheim “The Progressive Preponderance of Organic Solidarity” [Packet].

[Submit final version of paper to soci3220@gmail.com by midnight]

 

Thursday 10/16

Emile Durkheim “Social Rituals and Sacred Objects” FST: Selected Readings pp.206-18.

 

Tuesday 10/21

Writing Instruction II: Sources, Citation and Academic Honesty

 

Thursday 10/23

 “The Durkheimian Tradition  Four Sociological Traditions pp.224-241.

 

Tuesday 10/28

Erving Goffman “The Nature of Deference and Demeanor” FST: Selected Readings pp.244-261

 

 

VI. Microinteractionist Tradition

 

Thursday 10/30

“The Microinteractionist Tradition” Four Sociological Traditions pp.242-260.

 

Tuesday 11/4

Charles Horton Cooley “Society Is in the Mind” FST: Selected Readings pp.283-289

 

Thursday 11/6

George Herbert Mead “Thought as Internalized Conversation” FST: Selected Readings pp.290-303.

 

Tuesday 11/11

“The Microinteractionist Tradition” Four Sociological Traditions pp.260-290.

 

Thursday 11/13

Herbert Blumer “Symbolic InteractionismFST: Selected Readings pp.304-321.

 

 

VII. Final Papers

 

Tuesday 11/18

Writing Instruction III: Reviewing, Commenting and Revising

 

Thursday 11/20

Group discussion of paper topics

 

Tuesday 12/2

Draft grading session

[Three hardcopies of first draft must be brought to class]

 

Tuesday 12/4

Draft discussion session.

 

Monday 12/15

Final drafts must be submitted to soci3220@gmail.com by 8am

 


 

 

 

Student responsibility agreement

 

I have closely read they syllabus and fully understand what is expected of me in Sociology 3220, Fall Semester, 2008, and agree to the terms

 

 

 

Name: __________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Signature: _______________________________________________________

 

 

 

Date: ___________________________________________________________

 

 

 

[You have until the third class 8/26 to either withdraw or hand this in, or you will be automatically withdrawn]